The question of whether or not to use wireless systems seems to come up often in musician and sound reinforcement forums. I will address this topic by going over the pros and cons of each approach and finally give my opinion.
Wired systems, such as a guitar tied directly to an amplifier via an instrument cable or a microphone tied directly to a mixing board have been the standard practice for decades. This approach has been used for so long primarily because wireless technology is a relatively new technology. Just like any technology that has been in use for years, wired systems have matured to the level where they have been improved greatly in terms of performance, reliability and cost. Initial wired systems were prone to noise interference and unreliable (poor connectors, conductors, etc). Those issues have largely been removed with all but the least expensive systems.
Wireless systems, such as wireless microphones, are relatively newer technologies than their wired counterparts, but they have also matured. The initial wireless systems had issues in terms of radio interference, poor sound quality and reliability. Again, as the technology has improved these issues have been addressed in all but the least expensive systems.
So why would one choose one system over the other? There are many factors. I will list the pros and cons in general terms of each.
[table type=”table-striped”]
Wired Pro |
Wired Con |
Wireless Pro |
Wireless Con |
Great Sound Quality |
Performer mobility |
Performer mobility |
Cost |
Reliable |
Can improve ground loops in some cases. |
Reliability (dependent on battery power, interference) |
|
Cost |
Complexity |
||
Simplicity |
Standards in flux |
||
Standardized |
Sound quality generally perceived as less than wired systems. |
||
Passive Interconnect |
Can have reception problems in some venues. |